Skip to content

HFORM01: Risk Assessment Template

Form Reference: HFORM01 Version: 1.0 Classification: CRGI Information Form Owner: Sean Ashton, Operations Manager Purpose: Comprehensive risk assessment using L×C methodology per HPROC01. Documents systematic identification, evaluation and management of workplace hazards and risks.

Document Control

Version Date Author Change Summary
1.0 10/03/2026 Sean Ashton Initial issue

1. Assessment Details

Field Details
Assessment ID RA-YYYY-___
Assessment Date _________________
Assessment Type ☐ Initial
☐ Review
☐ Periodic
☐ Incident-Triggered
☐ Change-Related
Lead Assessor _________________
Assessment Scope _________________
Trigger/Reason _________________

2. Risk Assessment Methodology

CRGI Solutions uses a 5×5 Likelihood × Consequence (L×C) methodology per HPROC01

Likelihood Scale (1–5)

Rating Level Description Frequency
1 Rare Almost impossible to occur < 1 in 10 years
2 Unlikely Could occur but unusual 1–5 in 10 years
3 Possible May occur at some time 1 in 1–5 years
4 Likely Expected to occur periodically > 1 per year
5 Almost Certain Very likely to occur Multiple times per year

Likelihood Rating: ____

Consequence Scale (1–5)

Rating Level Description Impact
1 Negligible No injury/ill-health, minimal impact Minor cuts/bruises, < £5k cost
2 Minor Small injury/ill-health, limited impact Minor injuries, £5–20k cost
3 Moderate Medical treatment required, detectable impact Significant injury, £20–100k cost, short-term absence
4 Major Serious injury/ill-health, significant impact Serious injury/illness, £100k–500k cost, extended absence
5 Catastrophic Death or serious permanent damage, major impact Fatality or permanent disability, >£500k cost, reputational damage

Consequence Rating: ____

3. Hazard & Risk Identification

Activity Hazard Who at Risk Existing Controls
_________________ _________________ _________________ _________________
_________________ _________________ _________________ _________________
_________________ _________________ _________________ _________________

4. Likelihood Assessment

For each identified hazard, determine likelihood (1–5) based on frequency and probability.

Hazard Likelihood Rating (1–5) Justification
_________________ ____ _________________
_________________ ____ _________________
_________________ ____ _________________

5. Consequence Assessment

For each identified hazard, determine consequence (1–5) based on potential impact.

Hazard Consequence Rating (1–5) Justification
_________________ ____ _________________
_________________ ____ _________________
_________________ ____ _________________

6. Risk Rating Calculation

Risk Rating = Likelihood × Consequence

Risk Matrix & Scoring

L / C 1 Negligible 2 Minor 3 Moderate 4 Major 5 Catastrophic
1 Rare 1 2 3 4 5
2 Unlikely 2 4 6 8 10
3 Possible 3 6 9 12 15
4 Likely 4 8 12 16 20
5 Almost Certain 5 10 15 20 25

Risk Levels

Score Risk Level Action Required
1–3 Very Low Accept, monitor
4–6 Low Manage with standard controls
7–12 Moderate Enhance controls, review regularly
13–16 High Significant control improvements required
17–25 Very High Implement urgent controls, may restrict work

7. Current Risk Assessment

Hazard Likelihood Consequence Initial Risk Rating Risk Level
_________________ ____ ____ ____ _________________
_________________ ____ ____ ____ _________________
_________________ ____ ____ ____ _________________

8. Additional Controls Recommendation

List additional or enhanced controls to reduce risk:

Control Implementation Target Responsibility Estimated Cost
_________________ _________________ _________________ _________________
_________________ _________________ _________________ _________________

9. Residual Risk Rating

After proposed controls implemented:

Hazard Residual Likelihood Residual Consequence Residual Risk Rating Residual Risk Level
_________________ ____ ____ ____ _________________
_________________ ____ ____ ____ _________________

10. Risk Acceptance

Two-tier approval required:

  • CEO (Dragos Ciordas) approves High (13–16) and Very High (17–25) risk ratings
  • Operations Manager (Sean Ashton) approves Very Low to Moderate risk ratings
Risk Level Acceptable as Is ☐ Acceptable with Controls ☐ Not Acceptable ☐ Approver Date Comments
_________________ _________________ _________________ _________________
_________________ _________________ _________________ _________________

11. Sign-Off

Role Name Signature Date
Lead Assessor _________________ _________________ _________________
Operations Manager Sean Ashton _________________ _________________
CEO (if High/Very High) Dragos Ciordas _________________ _________________

12. Register Update & Monitoring

  • ☐ Risk recorded in HREG01 (Risk Register)
  • ☐ Risk recorded in HREG03 (Hazard Register)
  • Risk Owner: _________________
  • Next Review Date: _________________
  • Monitoring Frequency:

☐ Monthly ☐ Quarterly ☐ Annually ☐ Event-triggered

Notes on monitoring and review:



  • HPROC01: Risk Assessment & Management Procedure
  • HPROC02: Hazard Identification & Control Procedure
  • HREG01: Risk Register
  • HREG03: Hazard Register

Retention: 5 years after assessment closure Storage: CRGI Secure Document Management System Access: Management, Lead Assessor, Risk Owner Classification: CRGI Information — Internal Use Only


END OF FORM